SFEP home



ESTUARY Newsletter «To @@(newsletter_title)@@ Index

October 1999
Select any issue from
the menu in this bar.

Trinity Travails

Its partisans called the Trinity the "forgotten river," until last summer when flows from the river - 75% of which have been diverted to the Central Valley Project (CVP) since the early 1960s - emerged as a hotly contested prize in the state's water sweepstakes.

Last spring, U.S. Fish & Wildlife and the Hoopa Indian Tribe - which has federally protected rights to the river's fisheries - released the long-awaited Trinity River Flow Evaluation, which calls for doubling the amount of water released to the river to help restore decimated salmon and steelhead populations. The report coincides with negotiations for long-term CVP water contract renewals and ongoing State Board water rights hearings, and could play a role in both processes, as well as in CALFED, the state-federal effort to protect the Bay-Delta environment and water supply. "The Trinity is definitely in the eye of the storm," says Tom Stokely of the Trinity County Planning Department. An Environmental Impact Statement and Report for the flow decision is expected this fall, with a final decision due next spring from Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt.

Meanwhile, CVP contractors are urging that any Trinity River decisions be linked to CALFED. "We're talking about a $10 billion CALFED program that will produce, if we're lucky, as much water as they want to reallocate to the environment on the Trinity," says Jason Peltier of the Central Valley Project Water Association. "We're saying the Interior Secretary should look at the totality of water management in California." Language directing the Secretary to examine the Trinity in the context of CALFED was included in the House version of federal appropriations legislation.

Stokely says the CVP gets much more Trinity water than BurRec originally intended. He notes that the diversions recommended by the Flow Evaluation still amount to 53% of the river's flow, and actually represent a 1% increase in the amount proposed in 1952. "This is a case of mission creep," says Stokely. "The Trinity was never supposed to give up as much as it did. All we're asking is that the promises that were made back in the 1950s be kept."

Contact: Tom Stokely (530)628-5949, Jason Peltier (916)448-1638.

«To @@(newsletter_title)@@ Index

 


[ ABAG HOME | SFEP HOME ]

Copyright © 2002, San Francisco Estuary Project