
![]() |
Luring Terns How do you convince thousands of seabirds that they're in the wrong place? That's the task confronting Nanette Seto, the Portland-based biologist who runs Fish & Wildlife's Caspian tern management program. Caspians, North America's largest tern, once nested in interior wetlands like the Klamath Basin marshes. With these habitats lost, they shifted coastward. By 1991, most of the western population of Caspian terns had regrouped on Rice Island near the mouth of the Columbia River, where they took a heavy toll on hatchery-bred salmon and steelhead smolts heading out to sea. The birds were encouraged to relocate to East Sand Island, closer to the ocean, and salmonids dropped to 17% of their diet by 2004. But that's still 3.5 million fish, more than NOAA Fisheries considers acceptable. So most of the terns will be moving again: by reducing nesting habitat, wildlife managers intend to force 13,000 of the 18,000 Caspians to breed elsewhere. Plans call for the Army Corps of Engineers to create or enhance alternative breeding habitat in Washington, Oregon, and Northern California. In the Bay Area, target sites are Brooks Island, where encroaching vegetation will be cleared, Hayward Regional Shoreline, which already has suitable dredge-spoil islands, and the Don Edwards S.F. Bay National Wildlife Refuge, where a new island may be constructed in one of the salt ponds. Caspians are no strangers to the area-S.F. Bay used to house large colonies of the birds at Bair Island and Alameda; now there are about 1,000 pairs already nesting at Brooks Island and 50 at the Refuge. Fish & Wildlife will use decoys and recorded calls to attract terns to the new sites. Seto hopes Caspians that winter in Mexico and Southern California will stop to nest in S.F. Bay rather than continuing on to the Columbia. The impact on other Bay waterbirds is expected to be minimal; the big Caspian terns and the smaller, endangered least terns feed on fish of different sizes. A final environmental impact statement on the project awaits interagency consultation. Funding is problematic: The $400,000 price tag for the Bay component could be higher if erosion at Brooks Island is addressed, and post-hurricane reconstruction in the Gulf of Mexico has stretched the Army Corps' budget. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||